BLOG POSTS
How to Create a Pull Request on GitHub

How to Create a Pull Request on GitHub

Creating pull requests on GitHub is one of the most fundamental skills in collaborative software development, allowing developers to propose code changes, review contributions, and maintain project quality. Whether you’re contributing to open-source projects or working on team repositories, understanding how to create effective pull requests can make the difference between seamless collaboration and chaotic code management. This guide will walk you through the entire process of creating pull requests, from initial setup to advanced workflows, including common pitfalls that even experienced developers encounter.

How Pull Requests Work Technically

A pull request is essentially a request to merge code changes from one branch into another, typically from a feature branch into the main branch. Under the hood, Git creates a comparison between the two branches, identifying all the differences (diffs) between them. GitHub wraps this functionality with a web interface that facilitates code review, discussion, and automated testing.

When you create a pull request, GitHub generates a unique reference that tracks all commits associated with that branch. As you push additional commits to the source branch, they automatically appear in the pull request. This live updating mechanism is what makes pull requests so powerful for iterative development and code review processes.

The technical flow involves several Git operations:

  • Branch creation and checkout
  • Commit creation and pushing to remote repository
  • GitHub’s diff generation and conflict detection
  • Merge strategy application (merge commit, squash, or rebase)

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide

Here’s the complete process for creating a pull request, starting from repository setup:

Initial Setup and Forking

First, you’ll need to fork the repository if you don’t have direct write access:

# Clone your forked repository
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/repository-name.git
cd repository-name

# Add the original repository as upstream
git remote add upstream https://github.com/original-owner/repository-name.git

# Verify your remotes
git remote -v

Creating and Working on Feature Branch

Always create a dedicated branch for your changes:

# Ensure you're on the main branch and it's up to date
git checkout main
git pull upstream main

# Create and switch to a new feature branch
git checkout -b feature/your-feature-name

# Make your changes, then stage and commit
git add .
git commit -m "Add descriptive commit message explaining the change"

# Push the branch to your fork
git push origin feature/your-feature-name

Creating the Pull Request via GitHub Interface

Once you’ve pushed your branch, GitHub will typically show a yellow banner suggesting you create a pull request. Alternatively, navigate to the original repository and click “New pull request”.

Key elements to include in your pull request:

  • Clear, descriptive title summarizing the change
  • Detailed description explaining what was changed and why
  • Reference to related issues using #issue-number syntax
  • Screenshots or examples if the change affects UI/UX
  • Testing instructions for reviewers

Using GitHub CLI for Advanced Workflows

For developers who prefer command-line workflows, GitHub CLI offers powerful pull request management:

# Install GitHub CLI first, then authenticate
gh auth login

# Create pull request directly from command line
gh pr create --title "Your PR title" --body "Detailed description"

# Create draft pull request
gh pr create --draft --title "Work in progress"

# View pull request status
gh pr status

# Check out a pull request locally for testing
gh pr checkout 123

Real-World Examples and Use Cases

Let’s examine several practical scenarios where pull requests prove invaluable:

Bug Fix Scenario

When fixing a critical bug in a production application:

# Create hotfix branch from main
git checkout main
git pull origin main
git checkout -b hotfix/fix-memory-leak

# Apply the fix
# Edit src/memory-manager.js
git add src/memory-manager.js
git commit -m "Fix memory leak in background process cleanup

- Add proper cleanup of event listeners
- Implement garbage collection for cached objects
- Fixes #1234"

git push origin hotfix/fix-memory-leak

The pull request description should include:

  • Steps to reproduce the original bug
  • Explanation of the root cause
  • Testing methodology to verify the fix
  • Performance impact assessment

Feature Development Workflow

For larger features requiring multiple commits:

# Long-running feature branch
git checkout -b feature/user-authentication-system

# Multiple commits over time
git commit -m "Add user model and database schema"
git commit -m "Implement JWT token generation"
git commit -m "Add password hashing and validation"
git commit -m "Create login and registration endpoints"

# Keep feature branch updated with main
git checkout main
git pull upstream main
git checkout feature/user-authentication-system
git rebase main

# Push and create pull request
git push origin feature/user-authentication-system

Comparison with Alternative Workflows

Workflow Type Best For Complexity Review Process Merge Strategy
GitHub Pull Requests Open source, team collaboration Medium Built-in code review, discussions Merge, squash, rebase options
GitLab Merge Requests Enterprise, CI/CD integration Medium-High Advanced approval rules Fast-forward, merge commits
Direct Push to Main Solo projects, urgent fixes Low Post-commit review Linear history
Email Patches Kernel development, mailing lists High Email-based review Manual patch application

Best Practices and Common Pitfalls

Writing Quality Pull Request Descriptions

A well-written pull request description serves as documentation for future developers. Include these elements:

## Summary
Brief description of changes made

## Changes Made
- Specific change 1
- Specific change 2
- Specific change 3

## Testing
- [ ] Unit tests pass
- [ ] Integration tests pass
- [ ] Manual testing completed

## Screenshots (if applicable)
[Add screenshots here]

## Related Issues
Closes #123
Related to #456

Performance Considerations

Large pull requests create several performance issues:

  • GitHub’s diff rendering becomes slow with files over 100KB
  • Review quality decreases significantly for PRs with 400+ lines changed
  • Merge conflicts become more likely with long-running branches
  • CI/CD pipeline execution time increases with larger changesets

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Many developers make these mistakes when creating pull requests:

  • Creating massive pull requests that are impossible to review effectively
  • Not keeping feature branches up to date with the main branch
  • Including unrelated changes in a single pull request
  • Forgetting to update documentation or tests
  • Not testing the changes locally before creating the PR
  • Using vague commit messages that don’t explain the “why”

Advanced Git Techniques for Better Pull Requests

Interactive rebasing helps create cleaner pull request history:

# Clean up your commit history before creating PR
git rebase -i HEAD~3

# In the interactive editor, you can:
# - Squash related commits together
# - Reword commit messages
# - Reorder commits logically
# - Drop unnecessary commits

# Force push after rebasing (be careful!)
git push --force-with-lease origin feature/your-branch

Integration with Development Infrastructure

Pull requests work seamlessly with modern development infrastructure. When working with cloud servers, whether using VPS for staging environments or dedicated servers for production deployments, pull requests can trigger automated deployment pipelines.

Automated Testing and CI/CD Integration

Configure GitHub Actions to run on pull requests:

# .github/workflows/pr-tests.yml
name: Pull Request Tests
on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [main, develop]

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - name: Setup Node.js
        uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: '18'
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm test
      - run: npm run lint
      - run: npm run build

Advanced Pull Request Features

GitHub offers several advanced features that enhance the pull request workflow:

  • Draft pull requests for work-in-progress code
  • Required status checks preventing merge until tests pass
  • Code owners file for automatic reviewer assignment
  • Branch protection rules enforcing review requirements
  • Auto-merge functionality for approved pull requests

Configure branch protection with these settings:

# .github/CODEOWNERS
# Global owners
* @team-leads @senior-developers

# Frontend code
/src/components/ @frontend-team
/src/styles/ @frontend-team

# Backend code
/api/ @backend-team
/database/ @backend-team @database-admin

# Infrastructure
/docker/ @devops-team
/.github/ @devops-team

Troubleshooting Common Issues

Merge Conflicts Resolution

When your pull request shows merge conflicts:

# Update your local main branch
git checkout main
git pull upstream main

# Switch to your feature branch and rebase
git checkout feature/your-branch
git rebase main

# Resolve conflicts in your editor, then:
git add .
git rebase --continue

# Push the resolved changes
git push --force-with-lease origin feature/your-branch

Failed Status Checks

When automated tests fail:

  • Check the detailed logs in the Actions tab
  • Run tests locally to reproduce the issue
  • Ensure your branch includes the latest changes from main
  • Verify that new dependencies are properly documented

Large File Issues

GitHub has size limits that can cause push failures:

# Remove large files from Git history
git filter-branch --tree-filter 'rm -f path/to/large/file' HEAD

# Alternative: use BFG Repo-Cleaner for better performance
java -jar bfg.jar --strip-blobs-bigger-than 50M your-repo.git

For extensive documentation on GitHub’s pull request features, refer to the official GitHub documentation. The Pro Git book provides comprehensive coverage of Git workflows that complement GitHub’s pull request system.

Mastering pull requests requires practice and attention to detail, but the investment pays dividends in code quality, team collaboration, and project maintainability. Start with simple changes, focus on clear communication, and gradually adopt more advanced techniques as your workflow becomes more sophisticated.



This article incorporates information and material from various online sources. We acknowledge and appreciate the work of all original authors, publishers, and websites. While every effort has been made to appropriately credit the source material, any unintentional oversight or omission does not constitute a copyright infringement. All trademarks, logos, and images mentioned are the property of their respective owners. If you believe that any content used in this article infringes upon your copyright, please contact us immediately for review and prompt action.

This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only and does not infringe on the rights of the copyright owners. If any copyrighted material has been used without proper credit or in violation of copyright laws, it is unintentional and we will rectify it promptly upon notification. Please note that the republishing, redistribution, or reproduction of part or all of the contents in any form is prohibited without express written permission from the author and website owner. For permissions or further inquiries, please contact us.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked